Removes old tests
This commit is contained in:
137
copycat/tests.py
137
copycat/tests.py
@ -1,137 +0,0 @@
|
||||
import unittest
|
||||
|
||||
from .copycat import Copycat
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def pnormaldist(p):
|
||||
table = {
|
||||
0.80: 1.2815,
|
||||
0.90: 1.6448,
|
||||
0.95: 1.9599,
|
||||
0.98: 2.3263,
|
||||
0.99: 2.5758,
|
||||
0.995: 2.8070,
|
||||
0.998: 3.0902,
|
||||
0.999: 3.2905,
|
||||
0.9999: 3.8905,
|
||||
0.99999: 4.4171,
|
||||
0.999999: 4.8916,
|
||||
0.9999999: 5.3267,
|
||||
0.99999999: 5.7307,
|
||||
0.999999999: 6.1094,
|
||||
}
|
||||
return max(v for k, v in table.items() if k <= p)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def lower_bound_on_probability(hits, attempts, confidence=0.95):
|
||||
if attempts == 0:
|
||||
return 0
|
||||
z = pnormaldist(confidence)
|
||||
zsqr = z * z
|
||||
phat = 1.0 * hits / attempts
|
||||
under_sqrt = (phat * (1 - phat) + zsqr / (4 * attempts)) / attempts
|
||||
denominator = (1 + zsqr / attempts)
|
||||
return (phat + zsqr / (2 * attempts) - z * (under_sqrt ** 0.5)) / denominator
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def upper_bound_on_probability(hits, attempts, confidence=0.95):
|
||||
misses = attempts - hits
|
||||
return 1.0 - lower_bound_on_probability(misses, attempts, confidence)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestCopycat(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
def setUp(self):
|
||||
self.longMessage = True # new in Python 2.7
|
||||
|
||||
def assertProbabilitiesLookRoughlyLike(self, actual, expected):
|
||||
actual_count = 0.0 + sum(d['count'] for d in list(actual.values()))
|
||||
expected_count = 0.0 + sum(d['count'] for d in list(expected.values()))
|
||||
self.assertGreater(actual_count, 1)
|
||||
self.assertGreater(expected_count, 1)
|
||||
for k in set(list(actual.keys()) + list(expected.keys())):
|
||||
if k not in expected:
|
||||
self.fail('Key %s was produced but not expected! %r != %r' % (k, actual, expected))
|
||||
expected_probability = expected[k]['count'] / expected_count
|
||||
if k in actual:
|
||||
actual_lo = lower_bound_on_probability(actual[k]['count'], actual_count)
|
||||
actual_hi = upper_bound_on_probability(actual[k]['count'], actual_count)
|
||||
if not (actual_lo <= expected_probability <= actual_hi):
|
||||
print('Failed (%s <= %s <= %s)' % (actual_lo, expected_probability, actual_hi))
|
||||
self.fail('Count ("obviousness" metric) seems way off! %r != %r' % (actual, expected))
|
||||
if abs(actual[k]['avgtemp'] - expected[k]['avgtemp']) >= 10.0 + (10.0 / actual[k]['count']):
|
||||
print('Failed (%s - %s >= %s)' % (actual[k]['avgtemp'], expected[k]['avgtemp'], 10.0 + (10.0 / actual[k]['count'])))
|
||||
self.fail('Temperature ("elegance" metric) seems way off! %r != %r' % (actual, expected))
|
||||
else:
|
||||
actual_hi = upper_bound_on_probability(0, actual_count)
|
||||
if not (0 <= expected_probability <= actual_hi):
|
||||
self.fail('No instances of expected key %s were produced! %r != %r' % (k, actual, expected))
|
||||
|
||||
def run_testcase(self, initial, modified, target, iterations, expected):
|
||||
actual = Copycat().run(initial, modified, target, iterations)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(sum(a['count'] for a in list(actual.values())), iterations)
|
||||
self.assertProbabilitiesLookRoughlyLike(actual, expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_simple_cases(self):
|
||||
self.run_testcase('abc', 'abd', 'efg', 50, {
|
||||
'efd': {'count': 1, 'avgtemp': 16},
|
||||
'efh': {'count': 99, 'avgtemp': 19},
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.run_testcase('abc', 'abd', 'ijk', 50, {
|
||||
'ijd': {'count': 4, 'avgtemp': 24},
|
||||
'ijl': {'count': 96, 'avgtemp': 20},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_abc_xyz(self):
|
||||
self.run_testcase('abc', 'abd', 'xyz', 20, {
|
||||
'xyd': {'count': 100, 'avgtemp': 19},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_ambiguous_case(self):
|
||||
self.run_testcase('abc', 'abd', 'ijkk', 50, {
|
||||
'ijkkk': {'count': 7, 'avgtemp': 21},
|
||||
'ijll': {'count': 47, 'avgtemp': 28},
|
||||
'ijkl': {'count': 44, 'avgtemp': 32},
|
||||
'ijkd': {'count': 2, 'avgtemp': 65},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_mrrjjj(self):
|
||||
self.run_testcase('abc', 'abd', 'mrrjjj', 50, {
|
||||
'mrrjjjj': {'count': 4, 'avgtemp': 16},
|
||||
'mrrkkk': {'count': 31, 'avgtemp': 47},
|
||||
'mrrjjk': {'count': 64, 'avgtemp': 51},
|
||||
'mrrjkk': {'count': 1, 'avgtemp': 52},
|
||||
'mrrjjd': {'count': 1, 'avgtemp': 54},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_elongation(self):
|
||||
# This isn't remotely what a human would say.
|
||||
self.run_testcase('abc', 'aabbcc', 'milk', 50, {
|
||||
'milj': {'count': 85, 'avgtemp': 55},
|
||||
'mikj': {'count': 10, 'avgtemp': 56},
|
||||
'milk': {'count': 1, 'avgtemp': 56},
|
||||
'lilk': {'count': 1, 'avgtemp': 57},
|
||||
'milb': {'count': 3, 'avgtemp': 57},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_repairing_successor_sequence(self):
|
||||
# This isn't remotely what a human would say.
|
||||
self.run_testcase('aba', 'abc', 'xyx', 50, {
|
||||
'xc': {'count': 9, 'avgtemp': 57},
|
||||
'xyc': {'count': 82, 'avgtemp': 59},
|
||||
'cyx': {'count': 7, 'avgtemp': 68},
|
||||
'xyx': {'count': 2, 'avgtemp': 69},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_nonsense(self):
|
||||
self.run_testcase('cat', 'dog', 'cake', 10, {
|
||||
'cakg': {'count': 99, 'avgtemp': 70},
|
||||
'gake': {'count': 1, 'avgtemp': 59},
|
||||
})
|
||||
self.run_testcase('cat', 'dog', 'kitten', 10, {
|
||||
'kitteg': {'count': 96, 'avgtemp': 66},
|
||||
'kitten': {'count': 4, 'avgtemp': 68},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
||||
unittest.main()
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user