Files
copycat/slipnet_analysis/slipnet_depth_analysis.aux
Alex Linhares 50b6fbdc27 Add slipnet analysis: depth vs topology correlation study
Analysis shows no significant correlation between conceptual depth
and hop distance to letter nodes (r=0.281, p=0.113). Includes
Python scripts, visualizations, and LaTeX paper.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-01 20:58:15 +00:00

47 lines
5.2 KiB
TeX

\relax
\providecommand\hyper@newdestlabel[2]{}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToFields[1]{}
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{}
\citation{mitchell1993,hofstadter1995}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}{section.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}The Slipnet Architecture}{1}{subsection.1.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.2}Conceptual Depth}{2}{subsection.1.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.3}Research Question}{2}{subsection.1.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Methods}{2}{section.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Data Extraction}{2}{subsection.2.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Graph Construction}{2}{subsection.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Hop Count Computation}{2}{subsection.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Handling Unreachable Nodes}{2}{subsection.2.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5}Statistical Analysis}{3}{subsection.2.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Results}{3}{section.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Network Connectivity}{3}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Hop Distribution}{3}{subsection.3.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Distribution of minimum hops to letter nodes}}{3}{table.caption.2}\protected@file@percent }
\providecommand*\caption@xref[2]{\@setref\relax\@undefined{#1}}
\newlabel{tab:hops}{{1}{3}{Distribution of minimum hops to letter nodes}{table.caption.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Descriptive Statistics}{3}{subsection.3.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Descriptive statistics for analyzed nodes (n=33)}}{3}{table.caption.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:descriptive}{{2}{3}{Descriptive statistics for analyzed nodes (n=33)}{table.caption.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Correlation Analysis}{3}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Visualization}{4}{subsection.3.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Scatter plot of conceptual depth versus minimum hops to nearest letter node. Reachable nodes (blue) and unreachable nodes (red, assigned hops=$2 \times 4 = 8$) are distinguished. Points are jittered vertically for visibility. The dashed line shows the linear regression fit.}}{4}{figure.caption.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:scatter}{{1}{4}{Scatter plot of conceptual depth versus minimum hops to nearest letter node. Reachable nodes (blue) and unreachable nodes (red, assigned hops=$2 \times 4 = 8$) are distinguished. Points are jittered vertically for visibility. The dashed line shows the linear regression fit}{figure.caption.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.6}Counterexamples}{4}{subsection.3.6}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Discussion}{4}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Orthogonal Design Dimensions}{4}{subsection.4.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}The Disconnected Cluster}{5}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Hub Structure}{5}{subsection.4.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Implications}{5}{subsection.4.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Limitations}{5}{subsection.4.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Conclusion}{5}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {A}Complete Data}{6}{appendix.A}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces All analyzed nodes sorted by hop count, then depth}}{6}{table.caption.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:complete}{{3}{6}{All analyzed nodes sorted by hop count, then depth}{table.caption.6}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {B}Link Type Distribution}{6}{appendix.B}\protected@file@percent }
\bibcite{mitchell1993}{{1}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{hofstadter1995}{{2}{}{{}}{{}}}
\providecommand\NAT@force@numbers{}\NAT@force@numbers
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Slipnet link type distribution}}{7}{table.caption.7}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:links}{{4}{7}{Slipnet link type distribution}{table.caption.7}{}}
\gdef \@abspage@last{7}