alex/copycat
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rename bondFacet to bond_edge_type and clean up slipnet.json

Browse Source 
The slipnet node previously called "bondFacet" was misleading since
"facet" is used throughout the codebase as a property name on Bond,
Group, and Rule objects. Renamed to "bond_edge_type" to better reflect
its role as a descriptor type category. Also removed precomputed
minPathToLetter data from slipnet.json.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex Linhares
2026-02-21 23:19:55 +00:00
parent 72d0bf3d3e
commit 866881be69
8 changed files with 121 additions and 603 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
slipnet_analysis/slipnet_depth_analysis.tex
View File

@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Figure~\ref{fig:comparison} shows scatter plots for all metrics. The eccentricit
The hop distance analysis ($r = 0.281$, $p = 0.113$) found no significant relationship between conceptual depth and distance to letter nodes. This weak positive trend fails significance, with $R^2 = 0.079$ explaining less than 8\% of variance.
Counterexamples abound: \texttt{bondFacet} (depth=90) is only 2 hops from letters, while \texttt{middle} (depth=40) requires 4 hops.
Counterexamples abound: \texttt{bond\_edge\_type} (depth=90) is only 2 hops from letters, while \texttt{middle} (depth=40) requires 4 hops.
\subsection{Eccentricity: The Significant Finding}
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ Node & Depth & Eccentricity \\
\midrule
letterCategory & 30 & 4 \\
length & 60 & 5 \\
bondFacet & 90 & 5 \\
bond\_edge\_type & 90 & 5 \\
\midrule
middle & 40 & 7 \\
identity & 90 & 3 (isolated) \\
@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ Standard centrality measures show weak negative correlations but none reach sign
The eccentricity finding reveals that conceptual depth partially reflects \emph{global} network position. Nodes with high depth tend to have lower eccentricity, meaning they are never ``too far'' from any other node. This differs from local centrality (degree, clustering), which shows no relationship.
Intuitively, abstract concepts like \texttt{bondFacet} or \texttt{samenessGroup} may have been positioned to be accessible from many parts of the conceptual space, even if they don't have many direct connections.
Intuitively, abstract concepts like \texttt{bond\_edge\_type} or \texttt{samenessGroup} may have been positioned to be accessible from many parts of the conceptual space, even if they don't have many direct connections.
\subsection{Local vs Global Structure}
@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ Node & Depth & Deg & Btw & Ecc \\
\midrule
letterCategory & 30 & 0.50 & 0.68 & 4 \\
length & 60 & 0.17 & 0.25 & 5 \\
bondFacet & 90 & 0.03 & 0.00 & 5 \\
bond\_edge\_type & 90 & 0.03 & 0.00 & 5 \\
middle & 40 & 0.02 & 0.00 & 7 \\
identity & 90 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 3 \\
opposite & 90 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 3 \\