alex/copycat
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add comprehensive centrality analysis to slipnet study

Browse Source 
Key finding: Eccentricity is the only metric significantly correlated
with conceptual depth (r=-0.380, p=0.029). Local centrality measures
(degree, betweenness, closeness) show no significant correlation.

New files:
- compute_centrality.py: Computes 8 graph metrics
- centrality_comparison.png: Visual comparison of all metrics
- Updated paper with full analysis

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex Linhares
2026-02-01 21:17:02 +00:00
parent 50b6fbdc27
commit 72d0bf3d3e
9 changed files with 621 additions and 531 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

67
slipnet_analysis/slipnet_depth_analysis.aux
View File

@ -4,43 +4,38 @@
\providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{}
\citation{mitchell1993,hofstadter1995}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Introduction}{1}{section.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}The Slipnet Architecture}{1}{subsection.1.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.2}Conceptual Depth}{2}{subsection.1.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.3}Research Question}{2}{subsection.1.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Methods}{2}{section.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Data Extraction}{2}{subsection.2.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Graph Construction}{2}{subsection.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Hop Count Computation}{2}{subsection.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.4}Handling Unreachable Nodes}{2}{subsection.2.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.5}Statistical Analysis}{3}{subsection.2.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Results}{3}{section.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Network Connectivity}{3}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Hop Distribution}{3}{subsection.3.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Distribution of minimum hops to letter nodes}}{3}{table.caption.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.1}The Slipnet}{1}{subsection.1.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {1.2}Research Questions}{1}{subsection.1.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Methods}{1}{section.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Graph Construction}{1}{subsection.2.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Metrics Computed}{1}{subsection.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Statistical Analysis}{2}{subsection.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Results}{2}{section.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Correlation Summary}{2}{subsection.3.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Correlations with conceptual depth (n=33)}}{2}{table.caption.2}\protected@file@percent }
\providecommand*\caption@xref[2]{\@setref\relax\@undefined{#1}}
\newlabel{tab:hops}{{1}{3}{Distribution of minimum hops to letter nodes}{table.caption.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Descriptive Statistics}{3}{subsection.3.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Descriptive statistics for analyzed nodes (n=33)}}{3}{table.caption.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:descriptive}{{2}{3}{Descriptive statistics for analyzed nodes (n=33)}{table.caption.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Correlation Analysis}{3}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Visualization}{4}{subsection.3.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Scatter plot of conceptual depth versus minimum hops to nearest letter node. Reachable nodes (blue) and unreachable nodes (red, assigned hops=$2 \times 4 = 8$) are distinguished. Points are jittered vertically for visibility. The dashed line shows the linear regression fit.}}{4}{figure.caption.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:scatter}{{1}{4}{Scatter plot of conceptual depth versus minimum hops to nearest letter node. Reachable nodes (blue) and unreachable nodes (red, assigned hops=$2 \times 4 = 8$) are distinguished. Points are jittered vertically for visibility. The dashed line shows the linear regression fit}{figure.caption.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.6}Counterexamples}{4}{subsection.3.6}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Discussion}{4}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Orthogonal Design Dimensions}{4}{subsection.4.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}The Disconnected Cluster}{5}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Hub Structure}{5}{subsection.4.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Implications}{5}{subsection.4.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Limitations}{5}{subsection.4.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Conclusion}{5}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {A}Complete Data}{6}{appendix.A}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces All analyzed nodes sorted by hop count, then depth}}{6}{table.caption.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:complete}{{3}{6}{All analyzed nodes sorted by hop count, then depth}{table.caption.6}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {B}Link Type Distribution}{6}{appendix.B}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:correlations}{{1}{2}{Correlations with conceptual depth (n=33)}{table.caption.2}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Visualization}{2}{subsection.3.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Conceptual depth vs eight graph metrics. Only eccentricity (*) shows significant correlation.}}{2}{figure.caption.3}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:comparison}{{1}{2}{Conceptual depth vs eight graph metrics. Only eccentricity (*) shows significant correlation}{figure.caption.3}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Hop Distance Analysis}{2}{subsection.3.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Eccentricity: The Significant Finding}{2}{subsection.3.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Eccentricity examples}}{2}{table.caption.4}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:eccentricity}{{2}{2}{Eccentricity examples}{table.caption.4}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Non-Significant Centralities}{3}{subsection.3.5}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Discussion}{3}{section.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Eccentricity as Global Position}{3}{subsection.4.1}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Local vs Global Structure}{3}{subsection.4.2}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Design Implications}{3}{subsection.4.3}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Limitations}{3}{subsection.4.4}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Conclusion}{3}{section.5}\protected@file@percent }
\bibcite{mitchell1993}{{1}{}{{}}{{}}}
\bibcite{hofstadter1995}{{2}{}{{}}{{}}}
\providecommand\NAT@force@numbers{}\NAT@force@numbers
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Slipnet link type distribution}}{7}{table.caption.7}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:links}{{4}{7}{Slipnet link type distribution}{table.caption.7}{}}
\gdef \@abspage@last{7}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {A}Complete Correlation Data}{4}{appendix.A}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Full correlation statistics}}{4}{table.caption.6}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:full}{{3}{4}{Full correlation statistics}{table.caption.6}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {B}Node Data Sample}{4}{appendix.B}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Selected nodes with metrics}}{4}{table.caption.7}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{tab:nodes}{{4}{4}{Selected nodes with metrics}{table.caption.7}{}}
\gdef \@abspage@last{4}