alex/copycat
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Adds random notes and plans

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
LSaldyt
2017-11-14 17:28:43 -07:00
parent f6f5fffc78
commit 57221b9c45
1 changed files with 13 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
papers/paper.tex
View File

@ -200,6 +200,19 @@ It would be interesting to not hardcode the value of $r$, but to instead leave i
However, this would be much like temperature in the first place....? However, this would be much like temperature in the first place....?
$r$ could itself be a function of temperature. That would be.... meta.... lol. $r$ could itself be a function of temperature. That would be.... meta.... lol.
\break
...
\break
And ten minutes later, it was done.
The "meta" formula performs as well as the "best" formula on the "ijjkkk" problem, which I consider the most novel.
Interestingly, I noticed that the paramterized formulas aren't as good on this problem. What did I parameterize them for? Was it well justified?
At this point, I plan on using the git branch "feature-normal-science-framework" to implement a system that takes in a problem set and provides several answer distributions as output.
Then, I'll do a massive cross-formula answer distribution comparison with $\chi^2$ tests. This will give me an idea about which formula and which changes are best.
I'll also be able to compare all of these answer distributions to the frequencies obtained in temperature removal branches of the repository.
\subsection{Steps/plan} \subsection{Steps/plan}
Normal Science: Normal Science: